Timothy C. Hain, MD • Page last modified: March 8, 2021
The purpose of this page is to list drugs well known to be toxic to the ear. It is not all-inclusive and it should not be relied upon for medical care.
|Drug||Vestibulotoxicity||Hearing Toxicity||Toxic Level|
|Cisplatin||Minor||69%||total dose > 200 mg/sq meter.|
Comment: While reportedly ototoxic, chemotherapeutic medications are rarely encountered as a source of vestibular dysfunction. Cisplatin is the most widely used anticancer drug currently and unfortunately, it is cochleotoxic, and may injure supporting cells (Ramirez-Camacho et al, 2004). The toxicity begins in the outer hair cells (Reavis et al, 2011) and for this reason DPOAE's have been suggested to be a reasonable method of detecting toxicity. The toxicity of cisplatin is synergistic with gentamicin, and high doses of cisplatin have been reported to cause total deafness. In animals, cisplatin ototoxicity is related to lipid peroxidation and the use of antioxidant agents such as vitamin E are protective (Rybak et al, 2000; Kalkanis et al, 2004).
There are many chemotherapy agents which have no credible evidence for ototoxicity, and also many in whom there are single case reports of dubious significance. In general, drugs that are "broad" in their effects on the body would be expected to also have some ototoxicity. Drugs that are very narrow, perhaps aimed at cell markers, would not be reasonably expected to be ototoxic. Some chemotherapy drugs are used in treatment of inner ear disease -- i.e. cytoxin, methotrexate, and Enbrel. These would obviously not be expected to be ototoxic.
|Drug||Vestibulotoxicity||Hearing Toxicity||Toxic Level|
|Azithromycin||not known||occasional||Very high dose required|
|Chloramphenicol||yes||sporadic reports only|
|Dihydrostreptomycin||minor toxic||very toxic|
|Erythromycin||yes||High IV doses only|
|Gentamicin||8.6%||minor||Usually 2 weeks|
|Neomycin||minor||very toxic||In topical ear drops|
|Polymyxin B||In ear drops|
|Tobramycin||Yes||minor in 6%||Less toxic than Gentamicin|
|Vancomycin||nontoxic or rarely toxic||none to moderate||synergistic with gentamicin|
Gentamicin is presently the biggest problem antibiotic with respect to ototoxicity as most of the other ototoxic antibiotics have been replaced. Netilmicin has equivalent ototoxicity to Gentamicin (Tange et al, 1995). Gentamicin was released for clinical use in the earlier 1960's. (Matz, 1993); Hearing toxicity generally involves the high frequencies first. Vestibulotoxicity is the major problem rather than hearing toxicity. Most persons with gentamicin toxicity have hearing appropriate for their age. Certain persons with mitochondrial deletions in the 12S subunit are much more susceptible to Gentamicin than the general population. Commercial tests are presently available to detect this deletion (the A1555 deletion). The prevalence of this mutation is not clear, but 1-2% of the population is estimated based on available data. It is likely that there are many other genetic mutations that confer susceptibility, so far undocumented by present day medicine.
Neomycin, another aminoglycoside, was isolated in 1949. It is now used mainly topically because of renal toxicity and ototoxicity (to hearing). Neomycin is poorly absorbed from the normal gastrointestinal tract -- about 97% is excreted in the feces. Neomycin is quickly and almost totally absorbed from body surfaces (except the urinary bladder) after local irrigation and when applied topically in association with surgical procedures. With repeated dosing, progressive accumulation occurs in the inner ear. Release occurs slowly over several weeks after dosing has been stopped. Hearing ototoxicity from oral absorption of Neomycin has been reported (Rappaport et al, 1986) and there may also be toxicity from ear drops in patients with perforated ear drums. This issue is still unsettled (as of 12/1/98). Neomycin toxicity is often delayed in onset and may not be noted until long after neomycin has been discontinued (Information primarily from the manufacturers literature, Teva Pharmaceuticals, 11/1999).
Kanamycin, also an aminoglycoside, was developed in 1957, and has been replaced by newer aminoglycosides such as gentamicin, tobramycin, netilmicin, and amikacin. It is not thought to be as ototoxic as neomycin.
Minocycline in large doses is associated with dizziness, sometimes attributed to vestibular side effects.
Streptomycin, the first clinically used aminoglycoside is now used primarily in treating tuberculosis because many gram-negative bacteria are resistant and because of substantial ototoxicity. Streptomycin is now rarely used in the United States.
Tobramycin is only rarely associated with ototoxicity (about 1/150 according to Neu et al, 1986), but there is clear evidence that it can produce a vestibular syndrome similar to gentamicin (Barrsma, 1979; Lehmann, 1976). Most cases of Tobramycin toxicity have occurred in persons with renal impairment. There has been little ototoxicity seen in persons with repeated dosing (Pedersen et al, 1987; Thomesen et al, 1979), which suggests that it may be handled differently by the ear. It is suspected that tobramycin is ototoxic to hearing in neonates but there is little evidence to prove this(de Hoog et al, 2002; 2003). In animals, tobramycin is much less ototoxic than gentamicin (Bamonte et al, 1986; Kitasato, 1990; McCormick et al, 1985; Petorossi et al, 1986).
Vancomycin, by itself, appears to have only minor ototoxicity, but it potentiates the ototoxicity of gentamicin as well as (probably) other aminoglycosides such as Tobramycin. Occasional persons do appear to have substantial vestibular toxicity from Vancomycin. The reason why occasional persons are more sensitive is not clear but might resemble the situation with Gentamicin where there is a susceptibility mutation.
There is a new drug, Televancin (VIBATIV), which is similar to vancomycin, used for variants of MRSA. It appears to be a little more toxic than vancomycin, at least for the kidneys. It is probably similar to vancomycin in terms of its interaction with gentamicin.
Related to tobramycin
|Antibiotic with suspected ototoxicity||Comment|
|Floxins (i.e. fluoroquinolones)||Anecdotal evidence of dizziness|
Comment: Although there is some evidence for dizziness, it is unlikely that the floxins are ototoxic.
Occasionally a persistent ataxia (unsteadiness) is reported following use of a floxin (e.g. ciprofloxacin, etc). All cases so far are anecdotal and there is no strong evidence for ototoxicity. Toxicity, if it exists, might involve some other structure than the ear, such as the cerebellum or perhaps the vestibular nerve (see below). Because toxicity is so sporadic it may require both exposure as well as a genetic predisposition for toxicity.
Also, some of the floxins can have an effect on blood glucose. Gatifloxicin (Tequin) can cause severe persistent hypoglycemia in elderly diabetics taking hypoglycemic drugs, and may cause hyperglycemia in patients with no history of diabetes (Medical letter, 2003). While these effects are not ototoxic, they might account for some dizziness side effects, which should respond to withdrawal of medication.
Peripheral neuropathy is also associated with fluroquinolones (Morales et al, 2019). As neuropathies can affect the vestibular nerve, this provides another mechanism other than toxicity to the inner ear. One would expect that the "vhit" test would be sensitive to this mechanism if true.
References regarding Quinolones:
- Jungst, G. and R. Mohr (1987). "Side effects of ofloxacin in clinical trials and in postmarketing surveillance." Drugs 34 Suppl 1: 144-149.
- Kiangkitiwan, B., Doppalapudi, A., Fonder, M., Solberg, K., & Bohner, B. (2008). Levofloxacin- induced delirium with psychotic features. Gen Hosp Psychiatry, 30(4), 381-383. doi:10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2007.11.003
- Liu, H. H. (2010). Safety profile of the fluoroquinolones: focus on levofloxacin. Drug Saf, 33(5), 353-369. doi:10.2165/11536360-000000000-00000
- Morales and others. Association between peripheral neuropathy and exposure to oral fluroquinolone or amoxicillin-clavulinate therapy. JAMA 2019, 76(7), 827-833
|Antibiotics Generally Considered Safe|
|Macrolides (e.g. Azithromycin and Erythromycin), except in very high doses.|
Etminan et al (2016) examined data from more than 6 million cases, and concluded that "there does not appear to be an increased risk of SNHL in patients treated with macrolide antibiotics." More recently, Ikeda et al (2017) concluded that "SNHL may follow macrolide exposure, even at standard oral doses." This was based on a review of 44 publications, only 3 of which were prospective studies, the rest being retrospective (i.e. case reports, no controls). We find the conclusion of Ikeda et al implausible and think that Etiman's conclusions are the more reasonable overall.
Erythromycin, although not an aminoglycoside like gentamicin, is ototoxic in high intravenous doses. (McGhan et al. 2003) . Pathologically McGhan and Merchant reported strial edema in all of the cochlear turns (in a single case report). This might account for the relatively flat threshold loss with good speech discrimination that is the hallmark of erythromycin ototoxicity. It might also account for some reversibly to the hearing loss.
Azithromycin, is a macrolide. Nevertheless, there are occasional reports of ototoxicity, when there have been prolonged and high levels. The high levels generally require intravenous dosing.
Other types of antibiotics.
Clindamycin has not been reported to cause ototoxicity, by itself, and is probably safe.
Chloramphenicol has been sporadically reported to be ototoxic systemically.
Metronidizole (Flagyl) has been reported on several occasions to be ototoxic (Blake and Butt 1984; Hibberd, Nicoll et al. 1984; Hibberd, Nicoll et al. 1984; Lawford and Sorrell 1994; Iqbal, Murthy et al. 1999; Riggs et al, 1990). Metronidizole toxicity fortunately appears to be rare and documented only by sporadic case reports.
Ear drops may contain antibiotics, some of which can be ototoxic when administered to persons with perforated ear drums. Cortisporin otic solution appears to be the most ototoxic to the cochlea of guinea pigs, with much less toxicity for gentamicin drops. Ofloxacin ear drops have negligible toxicity (Barlow et al, 1995). Neomycin containing ear drops have been reported to contribute to hearing loss (Podoshin et al, 1989) in a relatively small way, but a definitive assessment of risk has not yet been made. No cases have been reported of tobramycin drops resulting in ototoxicity. The vestibulotoxicity of most ear drops has so far not been studied, although case reports suggest that gentamicin containing drops are toxic when given over long periods of time.
There are several known interactions between families of ototoxic medications. Loop diuretics (see following) potentiate aminoglycoside toxicity. Vancomycin is synergistic with gentamicin in that it is more likely to cause toxicity, as is noise. Vancomycin, by itself in appropriate doses, is not especially ototoxic (Gendeh et al, 1998).
Delayed ototoxicity, meaning essentially toxicity which continues for several months after the drug has been stopped, has been well documented because the aminoglycosides are retained within the inner ear much longer than in the blood. Gentamicin has been reported to persist for more than 6 months in animals. Neomycin, streptomycin and kanamycin are also known to be eliminated from the inner ear slowly (Thomas et al, 1992)
|Lasix (furosemide)||No||Yes||Rarely significant|
|Bumex (bumetanide)||No||Yes||Less than Lasix|
|Edecrin (ethacrynic acid)||No||Yes||Same as lasix|
Diuretics generally considered Safe: Chlorthiazide
Diuretics are rarely a source of vestibulotoxicity. They are possibly a source of hearing disturbance. They may be synergistic with other aminoglycoside ototoxins such as gentamicin, neomycin, streptomycin and kanamycin. It seems prudent to attempt to avoid exposure to these agents if hearing is impaired.
Rybak LP. Furosemide ototoxicity: clinical and experimental aspects. Laryngoscope 1985 Sep;95(9 Pt 2 Suppl 38):1-14.
|mefloquine (Lariam)||Probable||Yes||Tinnitus and dizziness|
|Hydroxychloroquine (Plaquenil)||Unlikely||Rare||Hearing loss is minimal.|
|Chloroquine (Malaquin)||No reports||Yes (minimal)||Tinnitus|
Comment: While quinine ingestion can cause a syndrome including tinnitus, sensorineural hearing loss and vertigo (Obasikene et al, 2012), quinine derivative drugs are rarely by themselves a source of hearing disturbance. Some quinine derivatives, such as mefloquine (Larium) taken for malaria prevention rarely cause significant and long-lasting tinnitus. There is also some suspicion of vestibulotoxicity and CNS toxicity (Dow et al, 2006). Recent studies suggest that quinine impairs outer hair cell motility (Jarboe and Hallworth, ARO abstracts, 1999, #237).
The toxicity of chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine, used for treatment of Lupus was recently investigated by Polanski et al (2020). They concluded that "There is a high prevalence of hearing loss in SLE that is not affected by antimalarial drug use." About 20% of patients with SLE had hearing loss, compared to no controls. This suggests the risk of quinine related drugs is small. It also suggests that the autoimmune disorder (SLE) or perhaps other treatments such as NSAID drugs may have a more powerful effect on hearing than these quinine containing drugs.
We thank Lariam Action USA ( web site https://www.lariaminfo.org/),for supplying some of the references above related to Lariam.
Aspirin and Nsaids (non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents) -- are commonly used, and apparently are only toxic to hearing . These include Advil, Nuprin, Motrin (Ibuprofen), Aleve, Naprosyn, Anaprox (Naproxen), Feldene, Dolobid, Indocin, Lodine, Relafin, Toradol, Volteran, Salicylates: Aspirin, disalcid, Bufferin, Ecotrin, Trilisate, Ascriptin, Empirin, Excedrin, Fiorinal. Arthrotec (diclofenac and misoprostel) has been associated with tinnitus and hearing reduction (Bombardier, Peloso et al. 1995).
Kyle and associates performed a systemic review of the effect of aspirin, and summarized 37 studies containing 185,155 participants. Aspirin intake grater than 1.95 g/day (i.e. about 6 "regular" aspirin tablets), was associated with worsened hearing. They reported that no data was available to "confirm that long-term doses of 81 mg or 325 mg daily have no hearing consequences". In other words, it is possible that daily "low dose" aspirin may also cause hearing deterioration, presumably to a lesser extent. (Kyle et al, 2014).
Oddly, NSAIDs such as indomethacin appear to protect mouse cochlea against acoustic injury. (Hoshino et al, 2008). Of course, what happens in humans is unclear.
Hydrocodone in combination with acetaminophen (e.g Vicodin) has also been associated with hearing loss (Friedman, House et al. 2000; Oh, Ishiyama et al. 2000). A similar case of deafness associated with methodone has also been reported (Vorasubin et al, 2013). Complete deafness, treated with a cochlear implant, can occur in persons addicted to these medications. This clinical picture is sometimes misdiagnosed as autoimmune inner ear disease.
Fiorinal contains aspirin, which is well known to be an ototoxin capable of causing a sensorineural hearing loss and tinnitus (Brien 1993).
Over the counter headache powders also commonly contain aspirin or related compounds (salicylates) and therefore have a potential for causing hearing toxicity.
Medications for ulcerative colitis, such as Asacol contain salycylates. While they are designed to be mainly confined to the large bowel and rectum, nevertheless, if 20% is absorbed of a 400 mg tablet, and 1.2 to 1.6 grams is given/day, it is easy to see that this is the equivalent of roughly 300mg of salycilate -- which is enough to affect the inner ear.
Permanent hearing disturbances are possible but rare. They are most commonly seen in individuals who take aspirin in large doses for long periods, such as for treatment of severe arthritis. Occasionally persons with Menieres syndrome will develop a hearing disturbance from a small amount of a NSAID.
Naproxen has been associated with deafness (Kewitz 1986; McKinnon and Lassen 1998). I have also encountered patients reporting tinnitus and hearing reductions after taking Naproxen.
Acetaminophen is not generally thought to be ototoxic although in combination with hydrocodone as noted above there have been cases of hearing loss.
Styrene, toluene, and trichloroethylene have been reported to be ototoxic. These substances are highly lipid soluble and can also be neurotoxic. Their toxicity may be due to effects on central structures rather than the ear itself.
Although nearly all antidepressants impair balance, the mechanism of this effect is uncertain, and probably it is not due to ototoxicity. It may be related to less concern about falling, leading to less cautious gait.
A single case has been reported of deafness following ingestion of sildenafil. This involved a 44 year old man who took 50 mg every day for 15 days (Mukherjee and Shivakumar, 2006). There also has been a recent report of hydrops in mice from sidenafil. (Degerman et al, 2017)
Amiodarone has been reported to be associated with bilateral vestibular weakness, presumably through damage to the vestibular nerve. Amiodarone has many potential mechanisms of ataxia, and this is just one of them. (Hindle et al, 2008)
Rhythmol (propafenone) may have a similar problem, as there are reports of ataxia (Odeh et al, 2000).
Of course cardiac drugs that lower blood pressure can impair balance should blood pressure get too low. This includes many cardiac drugs.
|Desferroxamine||No||Yes||May protect against gentamicin toxicity|
|Calcium Channel blockers||Probably||No evidence of this to date|
|Tacrolimus||Yes||Weak evidence (see Rifal, 2006)|
Calcium channel blockers are often used to treat vestibular disorders, and by this reasoning, might be vestibular suppressants. In the authors practice, rarely calcium channel blockers appear to be associated with bilateral vestibular paresis, but nothing has written about this in the literature.
Tricyclic antidepressants impair balance (Li et al, 1996). This is probably due to their anticholinergic side effects. According to the same author, SSRI type antidepressants do not affect balance.
Carbon monoxide: There is a small literature, nearly all published in languages other than English, concerning cochlear and vestibulotoxicity from carbon monoxide (CO) poisoning. To us, it seems highly unlikely that CO would injure the vestibular apparatus in a selective fashion, and we consider CO induced isolated vestibular toxicity as highly unlikely.
Cobalt in hip implants. There is a small effect reported on high frequency hearing, and possibly tinnitus (Leyssens et al, 2019)
Mercury and lead are heavy metals which are ototoxic. Practically speaking, these agents are infrequent causes of hearing disturbance.
Toluene affects the ear (outer hair cells) causing hearing loss, as well as the brain.
Noise: e.g. Rock concerts, power equipment, gunfire.
- Leyssens L, Vinck B, Van Der Straeten C, De Smet K, Dhooge I, Wuyts FL, Keppler H, Degeest S, Valette R, Lim R, Maes L. The Ototoxic Potential of Cobalt From Metal-on-Metal Hip Implants: Objective Auditory and Vestibular Outcome. Ear Hear. 2019 May 29. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000747. [Epub ahead of print]
Little is known about protection. Noise avoidance is likely important, but even here the story is complicated. Moderate amounts of noise may protect from extreme amounts of noise. Anti-oxidants protect partially from noise or toxins in several animal models. In theory, protection from oxidative stress might be obtained by prevention of reactive oxygen species, neutralization of toxic products, and blockage of the apoptosis pathway. Toxic waste products can be neutralized with glutathione and derivatives (Rybak et al, 2000). Vitamin E may protect against cisplatin ototoxicity(Kalkanis, Whitworth et al. 2004). Apoptosis can be blocked using capsase inhibitors. Intratympanic dexamethasone has been reported to protect from cis-platin ototoxicity in rodents and humans (Murphy and Daniel, 2011; Marshak et al, 2014).
Doglan et al (2016) reported that misoprotol can protect from cisplatin-induced ototoxicity (in rats).
At this writing, all of these approaches are investigational and are not being used clinically. Most also require delivery systems that go directly into the inner ear, and are therefore impractical for clinical use (Van de Water and others, ARO abstracts, 1999, #21).
Recently effort has been put towards developing methods of grading ototoxicity that are clinically relevant, and in particular, related to hearing aid needs (Chang, 2011). Far more thought is needed about this.